You have been presenting Worktable for the past 10 years, and the performance has been seen in 45 cities around the world. How has it evolved since its inception?

Since 2011 certain segments have been polished and refined. I’ve slightly modified the structure of the rooms where the different actions take place, and reduced the list of objects available for selection, given that some objects are more popular than others.

That means I can better prepare these artistic events. I also work more closely now with the people who welcome the audience to the venue. It’s a very delicate task; you must provide solid information but not reveal too much of what is about to take place. But fundamentally, nothing has really changed. I think that what I like about this installation is the diversity of audience reactions. In each city the reactions are numerous and varied and universal; there are no notable differences city by city.

These are human reactions. I’m not present when the event takes place, so the people are left to themselves and no one is filming them. I really like that the experience is theirs. Often people don’t know my name, and that’s the way I like it. Most of the time people discuss it amongst themselves once it’s over. That’s what I prefer, knowing that they’ve shared a particular intimate experience, knowing that they then compare their emotional responses to the experience, that they are surprised that each has experienced something quite different from the others.

How has your work been honed and refined over the years?

My background is fairly traditional. I was trained as a dancer and became an actor in my twenties. Then I started creating shows where I danced and acted. I quite like the theatrical aspect of my work, but I developed a growing interest in objects, their shape and form.

Then I became interested in the spectator, in incorporating the audience into my research on objects. Worktable is my first piece to reflect those two interests. I really wanted to create a piece where no one is watching, and no one is being watched. I started this piece because I’ve never liked shows where people are asked to participate, as I find the premise very suspicious. I wanted to create a performance where I would feel at ease, pursuing something I’m curious about. Worktable is part of a trilogy of performances (along with All Ears and In Many Hands) that involve the active participation of the spectator. I learned a lot doing those pieces, which toured for many years.

I’ve just presented a project called To Speak Light Pours Out, which is based on sounds and music. The audience is seated around the stage where three performers create rhythms with drums and percussion, with some poetic and political texts also featured. Challenged in a gentle way, the audience is part of this particular space that allows us to listen together, but each at his or her own pace, an approach I had experimented with in other works. We created a soundscape that channels the energy of the rhythms, voices and texts, and their meanings.

People enter your installation and are mostly alone in a room as they engage in transformative actions. Do they all respond in the same way to the work to be done and the ensuing result?

Some people are emotionally invested in the objects they choose. They recognize them as part of their own personal story. Others do not feel that connection. I place objects in the room without specifying any meaning to them. The object is simply there and you work on taking it apart.

It is individuals themselves who create the emotional content. When they arrive in the final room and see all those objects on display, they find it very beautiful, very moving. Prior to arriving there, they had a hands-on understanding of how the objects were re-imagined with care and attention. They are well aware that choices were made, because they were confronted with making choices and also with the difficulty of finding solutions to the problems involved in creating new objects. Some find that last room somewhat sad. It’s as though they are in a hospital surrounded by suffering people, which I completely understand. Some stay there for hours; it can become very meditative.

Worktable is very much about transformation, about change. And the period we are now in is one of profound change. Unexpected, not at all welcome, but unmistakably an imposing presence. We might ask ourselves, How can I engage with this period? What energy do I want to bring into this changing world? The idea for the installation came from an earthquake in New Zealand in 2011. I imagined this piece soon afterward. The thought occurred to me that everything could explode, everything that seemed solid could be pulverized. It was a violent thought, but also full of potential for renewal.

Interview with Kate McIntosh | Worktable

More news

Interview with Tamara Cubas

Interview with Serge Aimé Coulibaly

Interview with Charlie Khalil Prince and Olivia Tapiero